4090 vr reddit. 4080 worth absolutely the price and Im happy with it.

4090 vr reddit But they still look and play fantastic. I think you'd be extremely happy with the performance upgrade with the 4090. I'm going to skip 5xxx series. Am running at UltraHigh VR preset with DLSS on Balanced, no AA, getting about a solid 90! High res full race video for anyone interested. Suprisingly the performance was even better than 3080 using low settings. VR Flight Simming is pretty bleeding edge. (5408 x 2736). With VR & future releases/optimizations in-mind and money aside, what would be the better purchase — a 7800x3D or a 7950x3D for pure VR sim-racing gaming? Rest of the PC specs I'll be running the CPU with a 4090 24GB ROG Strix, Corsair DOMINATOR Platinum RGB 32GB 6000MHz AMD EXPO DDR5 & ROG STRIX X670E-F GAMING WIFI AM5 DDR5 PCIe 5. 5). What is the best Modlist for that? I don't need any lightweight lists since my computer can definitely handle some intense games. Nov 28, 2023 · I have tried the solution described in this reddit thread (changing the vsync_to_photons_increment value), it didn't work for me: https://www. Specs: 4090, i9, Quest 2 Ultra The 4080 is about 70% as fast as the 4090 at 4k at 75% the price. Making this thread because I would like to read your comments about your prefered simracers and the 40-series, and if anyone is planning to upgrade. But after switching from a 5600x to the 5800x3d most stutters were gone. Im curious about upgrading to a 4090 mostly because of vr. Timespy Extreme and Port Royal, share results. If you see drops below your refresh, that's not good performance. However, the only way that the RTX 4090 can play on VR Epic is to lower the SteamVR render resolution to 100% as it is best to have no synthesized frames. My VR playspace and setup 4090 is a VR game changer. Running a 4090 with a 5800X3D and 32GB of 3600MHz RAM and running Marinaras is either a choice between; slide show visuals making things so low resolution you can barely see it introducing lots of visual artefacts with FSR So I’m done with VR and being done with VR I’m done with DCS. I used a CV1 on a i7-4790K, with a GTX970. I cant think of anythign else to turn down to see if I can get rid of the microstutters. The 3090 ws supposed to be the first 8k gaming card (tho its success is debatable) but the 4090 being as much as 100% faster (according to some benchmarks i saw), it can definitely run games in 8K so yeah, VR should be a piece of cake for it I run a 4090 rig myself. Then I upgraded to a 4090 and and able to crank absolutely everything to max and I max out the 90Hz refresh rate in VR, in all scenarios, during MP, while using multithreading. 2fps. So imo, if u dont run ultra enb etc. Also, I don't get why people are so insistent on motion controls. When I launched HF-Alyx again, I did not get the message, but the game was choppy and laggy, After closing the game, steam vr still kept using more than 90% of the gpu memory. Any idea of what could be the issue? It will be stupid to buy 4090 now. It’s magic, magic! I’m curious about what other folks who use a Crystal with a 4090 are landing on for their preferred settings, in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, now that foveated rendering is here. The CPU wasn't even sweating. I am about to finally jump into VR for sim racing (and 4K gaming in general) and am upgrading my entire computer setup prior to buying the VR headset or 4K monitor themselves. P3 car open roof. If you want to try VR, you could try AMD but even without DP 2. There's very little that will actually USE the horsepower of a 4090. Only get the 4090 if you are absolutely certain that you'll need every last drop of performance out of your gpu. Was considering the 4090 but I may end up just going for a used 3080ti or something Just been flying in it 4090, VR G2, intel i9. the 4090 reference design is quite good this year. After closing the game, steamvr kept using around 90% of the rtx 4090 ram. So I researched and researched. I use VR - a G2 via OpenXR and 100% rendering… Nice to see such good performance. ) Still though, it was one of the most magical VR experiences I've had. I tried the epic vr preset in ACC. I played DCS VR with OpenComposite on my Reverb G2 and finally got running smoothly and consistently after days of constant tweaking. " So only 4090 and 4080 left. I setup all settings on ultra (the language is Polish btw :D) but game doesn't look that good in vr on Pico 4 and Virtual Desktop and I have 45 fps on average. I have iRacing, AMS2, and Raceroom I also play in VR. If you want to shoot for top-end VR (Varjo Aero, Pimax Crystal when it ships in approximately 6 centuries), accept no substitutes. Any processor in existence would be the bottleneck to that GPU, and even a few rungs down the ladder. The 4090 MSRP is $1,600 and will be available on 10/12/22. Currently using a 6900 xt. Runs perfect with an XTR 4090 Intel i9 13900k and VIVE PRO 2. When I contacted VIVE support, they told me that they've had a lot of reports of 4090's with VR. I am probably going to get a 4090 PC at some point, my only concern is I live in a old house, we renovated everything modern but the wiring is still old, hopefully doesn't cause problems. Ancient dungeon wasn't too bad. I'd say you can dial in the settings and make it a passable experience but it still feels like the 4090 isn't quite powerful enough for this (in my opinion. But would think 4090 probably the fist card that makes 4k worth it. I upgraded from a 3090 and it is absolutely worth it if you can afford it, the VR experience is finally excellent and I don’t even bother with flat screen. Hi, I have 4090 paired with older CPU - ryzen 3900x. Image quality and sharpness is very good. Running an RTX 4090 and a Ryzen 7 7800X3D, so I am looking for a headset that can leverage this performance. Using FSR 1 and scale to 1. It genuinely feels like the next generation of VR. What is fps vr reporting when you experience these lag spikes (high frame times on cpu or gpu)? Did you use DDU to clean install your Nvidia drivers? I dont know if this would help but I have experienced a similar issue before upgrading to the 4090 that was resolved by bringing the Steam window to the front rather than the game window. From what I can tell this is without DLSS 3. Alone on the green hell, damn it looks so freaking good and clear. So my advice is, if you are a VR enthusiast, build a desktop for it. VR is finnicky. The exact laptop model would also be useful, laptops supply different amounts of power to the graphics cards which causes performance differences The community for Old School RuneScape discussion on Reddit. Most VR games are simple graphics or a few years old at this point. It's what is preventing my 3080 from getting BeamNG VR working beyond "Low" settings. Jeez. The mod author highly recommends minimum 60fps minimum as since the mod is not a native component to the game, the only way to do it is alternate eye rendering, so 60fps to my understanding is Varjo Aero, run it 35 ppd, ultra settings and supersampling in Steam VR to 190%. Try that in dcs, msfs, resident evil 2, cyberpunk vr, etc. Here are the games supported with the latest Luke Ross mod if you are interested. skill ddr5 6000 cl32 2 tb kingston fury ssd nvme Windows 11 Official oculus link cable We are Reddit's primary hub for all things modding, from troubleshooting for beginners to creation of mods by experts. Lowest possible SS. Tempest is great and has potential but they are still working through it. With it I get about 30fps. R5 5600 and 6700 xt. VR pre-rendered frames at 2…on to game. It is, and handles it no problem non VR in cyberpunk, but in VR I get about 60fps maxing everything out with no raytracing. It's not mentioned in any VR guides. Two options: 1. Is there a driver problem? RTX 4080 (both version), 4090. Or the RTX 4090 is 75% faster (range from 64% to 85% faster). Also, DLSS 2. I have a vive pro 2 as well. e. Better value, compared to the 4080, and a better long term investment with regards to VR. 4090 is the monster but costs too much and in my opinion the 4080 could be sufficient in vr and monitor gaming. I now own rtx 4090, i9 13900k, 32gb DDR5 7200 mhz. But dude is working on a mod that let's every unreal engine game work in vr. Right now, I have it set at 90hz and max 1. So yes, for high res VR the 4090 looks like a beast but Varjo HMDs are incompatible for now. run the benchmark you should get a nice 90fps average. The difficulty in your situation is justifying the $$ for a 4090 + 4k monitor. I have tried fsr but the artifacts are way too visible and it just looks artificially sharpened. And most only showing 90 fps cap (which RTX 4080 mostly can do). At the moment I plan to upgrade my 9900k to the 13900k+ddr5 first. Dude, the 4090 is the biggest "HOLY FUUU" upgrade I have ever experienced, the performance is outrageous. System Specs: 12900KF @ 5. The ACC racing experience is better with the RTX 4090. I’m coming from a 3090 and it ran well so let’s see the improvement. With the 4090, I get 52-54% GPU load, same settings, solid 90fps. My personal opinion is yes, it's worth it. I'm getting only 60 fps with 99% reprojection on skyrim, completely unmodded on a fresh That said with some of the extra setting in IR turned up like extra light points, mirrors, and Q’s the 4090 can easily drop to 60-90 when there are lots of cars. Only resolution and some eye candy. I’m using the Meta Quest 3 VR headset playing wirelessly via air link through the Oculus PC app. Windows 11 Asrock x570 taichi 5900x Rtx 4090 32gb ram 3200mhz Hp reverb g2 on a pci usb 3. I know the 4090 is the best, but where I live that is another $800 or ~75% increase in price over what a 4080 Super goes for. If anyone has had this problem and found a fix please do share Ryzen 5 7600x Pny rtx 4090 32gn g. Got my 4090 over the weekend and decided to post a few test results vs the AI. After 2017 I believe since its when unreal engine got updated and has leftover vr tools. It comes with it. For most people, the cool factor of being able to look around and live in the world outweighs the clarity drop off. headstrap) is around $1500 I had the same problem with my 4090. My laptop is still here dusting up. However I want to use my VR occasionally too (Quest 2) and it is known that HAGS needs to be turned off to avoid performance issues. Then maybe in 6 months I can go for the 4090 (or 4090ti). But like elite doesn't have a separate vr version. I use a 3070ti and it plays native VR games pretty much all on high. It will hold consistent 90 fps at 1. Best tracking (well same as index) and picture quality is just jaw dropping if you have a 4090. I always thought VRC was cpu bound but I’m curious to see if there’s a noticeable improvement. So i drive a little an d tried to look at fps VR (is there a way to move the overlay because i crash when i look down. Ask EVGA haha :'(and defo all of what you said shows - 4080 can be found easily RN (EU region) in many variants (about 10) while 4090 doesn't have a single good variant available, only 3 and the "cheapest" ones that are worse than reference (no reference in EU sadly). But one review where they used Index (144hz). I run Steam VR on 100% res and VD on 2070 (mid) settings even if I have a 3070. 63 unconstrained FPS together with 6346 (50%) synthetic frames but with no dropped frames nor Warp misses. Then again I'll probably just end up saying to hell with it and get the 4090, it does seem to be an absolute beast of a card. The remaining 33% is Luck. CPU is also important Bad I guess, on Reverb G2 I can get 90 fps on 50 scale or use SteamVR motion smoothing with 90 scale. Before my comments gets downvoted into oblivion List of VR Overhaul updates - Individual comparisons at end of video . Nvidia officially announced the release of its 4090 and 4080 GPU's today. VR Settings: Reverb G2 with OpenXR. Running the 120hz VR Settings preset and was going back and forth between 60 and 120. My 4080 can push Half Life: Alyx (arguably one of the best looking VR games still to this day) at 120fps, max graphics settings, 3-4k per eye, etc. Not enough horsepower, so I sprung for an MSI water cooled 4090. ACC is a blurry mess. Obviously as everyone says get the best GPU and CPU you can afford but with the new blazing fast i5 and mid-range AMD processors out there, as well as GPU and VR headsets falling down a bit in price (Quest 2 especially), and of course multi-threading with the upcoming DLAA support, now is a great time to get into VR! In Slovakia, now that AMD is actively regulating GPU prices, most 7800 XT’s are down do 550€, these being the XFX Merc319’s, TUF’s and Sapphire Nitro+’s, whereas the cheapest 4070S is at 680€, but most of the viable, higher quality cards are priced at 750+. A year later I finally decided to go in full and built a 4090 desktop for vr, and it’s my best purchase decision by far, enjoying vr in full high settings and high fps. A monitor set up will 100% look graphically better than VR, but you can't look behind you. (6044 x 6226). I guess you need 4080/4090 to actually have good scaling and performance. I’m having an issue with ETS2 in VR mode that I’ve spent the past two days trying to solve but with no success. If you are into VR or heavily modded games/unoptimized games the VRAM for the 4090 will be worth the $300 alone. 0 card. But if you want to save money then any lower card will still work, you just need to dial the settings down more. Simple as that. High res for those interested! CONS FIRST: Yes there's no hud lock turning yet, no ship control switching yet, no left handed controls yet, can look pretty smudgy when not running at high Do an easy test and set it to a lower resolution, like 75% with reprojection turned off at 120fps first then try 144hz at 75%. Wireless is a cool gimmick but without extra battery packs its useless for any real game sessions. No man's sky still runs like crap, even with a 4090, I upgraded from 3070 and performance fluctuates to much. Always. Superlative - brings out the very best of MSFS- feels like I’m actually flying smoother -delivers on everything promised with no compromises BUT obviously at that price…. But if you want a Crystal and don't have a 4090 or aren't planning to get one, you're hamstringing your HMD. Thing is a beast. 0, Nvidia is still better since a lot of VR headsets out right now are wireless and vastly prefers Nvidia's encoders over AMD's. I was a little disappointed when I went from the 2080ti to the 3090. When I use VR - Ultra present I hit around 65-75 fps in the menu. 7 but the microstuttering is worse. Edit: Figured I may as well be my own guinea pig, I bit the bullet and upgraded to from a 3080 to a 4090. Have… Thinking of upgrading to 4090 (from 3080ti), in hopes to fix VR but I'm not sure if 5800X3D will be enough to handle the 4090. Note: if you have recommendations for a different CPU for VR that runs better than the current one, I would be interested in hearing them. We finally have (in my opinion) the first fully legitimate VR benchmark via OpenVR Benchmark, which has the full cost of running VR included, no faked 'render two different windows but no VR involved' business some of the other benchmarks run. The conclusion tends to agree: In the last Ampere generation, the $699 RTX 3080 provided the best value, but almost unbelievably, the RTX 4090 provides the best performance bang for buck in Nvidia’s new Ada Lovelace lineup so far. So naturally I picked up Skyrim VR. And that the rest of your PC can handle it, no point in getting a monstrous GPU if you're picking slow RAM and a sub-par CPU. I have a 4090 and a HP Reverb G2 but don't actually use VR anymore as I prefer to use my 57" Neo G9 ultrawide monitor , I didn't like strapping the headset to my head as it becomes uncomfortable for long periods , also when it's hot it's also uncomfortable to use due to I also ran this mod a while back on my 4090. But If you need it now for a nice summer with VR than go for it and lets see what the future brings. Is use the 2real filter + preset. Hardware is 33% of VR, and Software Configuration also 33% of VR. 4000 series nvidia cards can utilize av1 encoder which is the best encoder available rn so id definitely go with a 40 series if i were you. Only dude I actually respect in the vr modding scene is praydog. Before the upgrade, 3080 is capable to run my Reverb G2 at 70% resolution scaling and a mix of high and medium graphic settings If you play MSFS, go with the 4090. Not an expert and obviously ACC is a terrible vr game but still I would have expected the 4090 to carry the game better even just by brute force. I still don’t think even a 4090 is enough for a more modern VR headset but it does just fine for the pro. HAGS may effect the 4090 in VR applications differently then the 3080 / 90. UPDATE: Nvidia control panel settings "texture filtering- negative LOD bias" changing this to "clamp" seemed to have helped a lot. A bit of tuning of settings is still needed to make your experience enjoyable with VR. Just make sure to pick up Index controllers to go with it (they are natively compatible). I'm itching to build a VR setup myself, just waiting to see how the XTX performs as it might be worth the trade-off of a bit of outright visual grunt for that price saving. Reply reply 90hz - VR Settings = Locked 90 fps no reprojection/asw 120hz - VR Settings = Locked 120 fps no reprojection/asw Also joined GS multiplayer server and I hit reprojection on the ground with an f18. BabelTechReviews couldn't benchmark it in VR, but the 4090 destroys the 4080 in 4K pancake results: 88. If you remind me in like 9 hours, I can give it a go for you. VR low preset both. Unfortunately VR benchmark is scarce. Ti Super is better than the $1500 3090 The next gen equivalent let say cost $1000 in a year and better than 4090. You have a point. $500 dollars vs $2,000 dollars for an uplift in resolution (if you can drive it) is just. I use the Quest 3. They all look just fine. 250+fps?? Come on. The 4090 performed 70-85% faster than a 3090 in the VR benchmarks. System itself seems to work fine - great scores on cinebench and 3dmark, and I can maintain 144 fps in fallout 4 vr. I am tempted to upgrade my 3090. If you're interested in playing high end VR games like MSFS, Cyberpunk VR mod, fully modded SkyrimVR, Resident Evil 8 VR mod, racing sims, etc, then it will eat anything you throw at it. For VR you should always go for the best GPU you can afford as VR is very heavy on your GPU so I would be getting the 4090. I became interested in Sim racing and I started using my vive pro with a 2080ti. Edit: and here come the downvotes. We ask that you please take a minute to read through the rules and check out the resources provided before creating a post, especially if you are new here. . 10ms, 8K without VR Performance Kit upscaling, Scenery ENB (did not recognize this at first, looks totally different than other Scenery ENB videos), it is crazy. I love this combination. I finally settled on the headset I am choosing, which will be the Quest Pro headset for $1K. Not only ly did this dude create basically an actuall port of resident e il in vr where motion controlls work. I9-13900K and 4090 with 32gb ddr5. Seems like the 3090>4090 is a bigger jump. Subnautica is an amazing game and I've just started playing it in VR with a 4090, go to nexus mods and download 'VR enhancements' mod and VR Performance' mod, they are pretty much vital. I used to mod on a 1080ti and can tell you that getting a 4090 will make your performance worries disappear. But I will say between this and DCS and simracing, the 4090 is the first card I’ve owned that feels truly VR ready for sims. RTX 4080 (both versions), 4090. Honestly if you want vr and high details should waiting years because its impossible to satisfy any aspectative. Steam ss 150%. com/r/SteamVR/comments/118vlrl/fix_for_rtx_4090_and_vr_tracking_input_latency_lag/ Oct 11, 2022 · The $1599 RTX 4090 Performance of 45 Games, VR, SPEC, Pro Apps, Workstation & GPGPU. It’ll do great. I'm absolutely not suggesting everyone needs a 4090. iRacing is single thread CPU-limited, meaning the bottleneck is the maintainable max Instructions Per Second of one of your CPU-cores. That 2016 system still races in VR today. 4080 worth absolutely the price and Im happy with it. But having a good cpu is essential too, especially if you want mods like DynDOLOD. It really doesn't hurt immersion though. It acts differently on win11 then it does on win10. There isn't a SINGLE voice in VR development advocating for anything except fixed frame rates in VR. Nov 29, 2023 · Since upgrading my PC to a rtx4090 I haven’t seen any benefit in using this anyway, at least not with msfs. VR runs at a locked frame rate. 48. What is the issue exactly? I am getting constant reprojection on my 4090/index where it will constantly drop 1-3 fps below max (regardless of what I have refresh to, its not a performance problem) and its fucking awful, tried everything I can to fix but VR has been largely made unplayable for me because of this. I'm thinking it just doesn't like my processor given that I get worse performance in that than I do DCS. I tried a clean drive install using DDU, but issues persists. 4090 is still in its infancy with drivers. VR has reprojection, which is doing something similar but better suited for VR, because it adds head movement and controller prediction in the process for each synthetized frame. I have over 750 mods (added off and on over several years) and looks and plays amazing and very few bugs but it kept randomly crashing or freezing every 20 minutes or so. If this if your first VR headset, then you absolutely get the Quest 3. Yes. If you have the money the 4090 is a better deal. Just imagine playing Skyrim running at Quest 2 native resolution, with maxed out details, 4k/8k texture packs and an ENB at 90fps. It is not as terrible as it was in F1 22 IMO, but still not fixed. I'm using a Quest 2, I have my oculus debug tool bitrate set to 500, refresh rate at 90. Could you talk about the performance you're seeing in anything besides msfs? How about sjyrim vr (modded) fallout vr any of the race Sims etc. You are pretty much a early adopter of the 40 series to the VR community and you will have to test all these things to see what has changed and what is best from one architecture to another. I did not expect this. After playing VR for so many years it could be so many things. Digging up this thread as I have just come back to Assetto VR (Pimax & 4090). Battle talent was a lot of fun. Still stutters. I’m getting about 33-35fps in msfs2020, ultra preset and DLSS quality, with the terrain LoD slider maxed out, cruising around Western WA, around 1,000ft feet For the 4090, removed FSR and used 100 percent steamVR SS and VR high. Thanks! Hard to find any information online about the pro 2 and 4090. As a result, the older games that looked good without a reliance on the post process and screen space effects tend to look and run much nicer in VR. Join us for game discussions, tips and tricks, and all things OSRS! OSRS is the official legacy version of RuneScape, the largest free-to-play MMORPG. Besides, it's a pain to have to keep turning it off and on all the time. I did feel that my 4090 actually has room for everything lmao, that card is ridiculously powerful for our era but that's precisely why it is a promising 4k gpu. i did and its the highest performance for me. Native resolution of the G2 is 3176x3104 (to correct for barrel distortion) so you can see we are starting to approach 4k resolution levels in a VR headset. These titles are referencing the 4090 being the only 40 series cards for a while being released. To show that if you’d be fine for a real $600-$700 card, you don’t need a 4090. An hour and a half - 2 hours is like 20 minutes in VR. Finally I have enough power to drive my VR headset to its potential. I found this information on something non VR related. I'm having really poor performance in Skyrim VR on my new pc. The frames I get in games like Superhot, Phasmaphobia, Boneworks, G-mod (VR- mod), and Half-Life Alyx. 1fps vs 63. The G2 for the price is than a much, much more sensible choice. Personally I am very happy with my 3080, in VR also, and I am not planning to buy. I save up for a long time to but this pc mainly to play skyrim vr so u can imagine my sadness. Difficult if changing weather. I can report that MSFS is playable with the 4090 on my Pimax 8KX rendering at nearly full resolution. EDIT - To avoid confusion, I'm only addressing those who want the best VR experience here and are planning on buying a $1500 headset. 4090 is already pushed to the max by the high end VR headsets, so when (and if) there will be DP 2. The future of VR is not new powerful GPUs, it is eye tracked foveated rendering that gives an almost 2x fps boost right away (as seen with the Varjo Aero on both of our 3080ti rigs) Note: This is ACC running OpenXR, which again is not implemented by Kunos but is an instant performance boost just by dropping the god awful steamvr and openvr crap Anyway below are my full system specs. I am most eager to get my 13900k on the 20th but I also want to dabble with the new tech in the 4090 I want to give my son my old computer. It is not cheap by any means but maybe you will be able to find a used one (or refurbished, from someone who sent back a melted If your objective is to run games at 4k 60 FPS, the 4090 will far exceed that. Most of my VR time is spent in VRChat with full body tracking, watching movies with friends. I am not familiar with the performance requirements for VR. I am getting the 4090 for multiple reasons: DCS is not the only sim I play. hard for me to justify the 4090 purchase was hard I got enough money to 4090 + Power Supply upgrade, but I’m thinking if it’s worth since I’m using my PC just to VRC and some other VR games A friend told me that beyond CPU, VRC uses the VRAM from the GPU and I’m changing from 8gb to 16gb or 24gb (if I go for 4090) but in his opinion it’s not worth to get the 4090 due to price difference What VR headset you have would be important, every one has a different resolution which impacts performance. If the 4090 is absolutely-definitely-no-question *REQUIRED* to run VR, then I'll just have to save harder, but if the 4080 Super is capable of running VR, I will give it serious consideration. I have just installed my new computer with a Ryzen 7700X, 32 gb DDR and a RTX 4090 and already without any tuning from OpenXR or similar I get a buttery smooth feel in VR even with the Pimax Modern game engines are crammed full of shaders and deferred rendering techniques that are hell to render twice like VR requires. The only downside so far is the existence of aliasing or shimmering on horizontal lines. Seeing as a laptop 4090 is just desktop 4080 chip with lower power, lower clocks and lower memory bandwidth I'm wondering if the eGPU desktop 4080 (restricted by PCIE 4. I spend a lot of money and time to find the best VR experience possible. The mod doesn't do anything with controls, so you set them down and go to a trackball mouse and keyboard. Stutter aside, on my VR-3 with the highest Varjo Base resolution, in OpenXR with dynamic foveated rendering I had a load of 90-94% for 90fps, fluctuating to ~87fps on my 3090. I haven't tried Skyrim VR much. On 4090 and 7800x3d. This is how VR racing should look like now. Even with a 4090 you need to save a wet setting and dry setting at the moment. VR heaven. I'm trying to figure out the best approach to getting rid of it, but so far, I'm thinking I need something beyond the 3080ti. Making this thread because I would like to read your comments about MSFS2020 and the 40-series, and if anyone is planning to upgrade. Even a 4090 won't let you max everything out. But 4090 is priced at ~$2000 on where I live. So far there are very few VR performance figures and none of them are done on squadrons. In other games I have much clearer graphics. I use Steam VR also, and I run it with Steam Home OFF and at 90hz at a max of 500% res. zero tolerance for self promotion, check the weekly "self promotion Saturday post" for that. A place to discuss any and all things Virtual Reality. There are some decent games for quest 2 native but most are more tech demos rather than just poor games. See this thread for everyone's advice on what headset to get: This isn't a scientific review with exact numbers, but I can tell you that the RTX 4090 is absolutely insane in VR for MSFS 2020. I cannot drive anything else after experiencing this. ETS2 launches via SteamVR on the -oculus launch beta command (1. If you're GPU bound on a 3090 and expect to be GPU bound on a 4090, you'll get about a 60-70% improvement in FPS, but personally I'd wait until they optimize it. unless you're talking about offline on a training mission. Nothing else comes close ( well the Varjo supposedly though I think it has pretty abysmal black levels compared to the Vive Pro 2). Even if nvidia changes mind and ups the specs and the price 4090 wil still be available and will be little less expensive. iRacing uses two cores max, and the physics thread is the limiting one. and that's a lot for a GPU to do in VR. 1 HMDs - 4090 won't have any performance left on the table to push higher resolutions, so GPU upgrade then is inveitable (if you will be still seeking to have the best possible experience). 2 weeks ago I purchased a 4090 to have extra VRAM for VR and in DCS. on my 5800X3D+4090+G2 I only get 90 fps when there isn't much going on for the CPU to handle The head bobbing issue is not completely fixed in F1 23 yet. VR is getting significantly better, and the immersion is great, but we're a while away from realistic clarity at a distance. Very stable for online performance. Blurry. Everything looks clear and the game was much more playable (was getting better laptimes as a result of this) Yup, 14900k and 4090 here, it runs like TRASH and always has. 😄) I have a 3080ti and i7-11700 and i only saw GPU drops. I have two VR rigs: 7950x MSI 4090 Suprim 5950x 3080ti FE My brothers 5950x 4090 ROG Strix OC We run both 4090's at 5###x4### per eye resolution (We use the varjo aero) I went from a 3080 to a 4090 and even that difference was NIGHT AND DAY, I don’t even bother overclocking the 4090. Currently have a steam deck and am thinking about getting the ally but was curious if anyone had used one to play vr games ( with an xg mobile). VR nirvana will be yours. BTR recently received a RTX 4090 Founders Edition (FE) from Nvidia and we have been testing it for the past ten days by using 45 pancake and VR games plus GPGPU benchmarks. 0 x4 lanes due to M2 slot) would perform the same as laptop 4090 in which case the ease and convenience of the 4090 laptop is worth the extra cost over the eGPU build. Please read the Guide and check the FAQ before asking questions. I've been having awful VR performance since I upgraded to 4090 since launch day with my vive 2 pro. F123 VR: enable osd fied mode off, resolution matches steamvr, override steeam vr scaling: on, scale factor, 100, bloom and god rays off, stencil mesh on. I’m using a pretty solid 4090 PC, with all drivers up-to-date. 4080 about ~$1500. But now, with the 4090, the varjo takes off into a quality level, the G2 just can't get to. I use FBT, 4 lighthouses and knuckles. 0 ATX Nvidea let me know if you have questions on this one…. But is it really necessary to turn the 4090/7800X3D settings that low? Bad selection of ancient games with potato graphics engines. Quit my job to stay home, get high, and fuckin race. I also have dedicated router with 5g network (tested in other VR games and its running fine). What do you use the rtx4090 for in VR? I'm planning to assemble a new PC and I'm hesitating between 4080/4090, I keep hearing that 4090 will be better for VR but are there games that require that much power? The only thing I can think of is heavily modded skyrim or VRchat and both don't interest me. Welcome to /r/VRGaming! A neutral zone for fans of all VR devices, specifically made for discussion about virtual reality gaming. I purchased my 3080FE in 2020 before I got a VR headset. But which one you get is totally up to how much you want to spend vs the performance you want. Buy 4090 if you just want the best now. 1 all Pcore static core ratio, 64 GB of DDR4 3000, GPU @ 100% power (not overclocked). My Specs are: CPU: I7-13700k GPU: RTX 4090 RAM: 32GB I play allot of Modded FO4VR and SkyrimVR. If you want to do VR now and into the future you need a 4090, nvidia has always been scummy with VRAM in its cards compared to amd and it really shows in VR. Should've waited for a 4090 Founders Edition, to be honest. There's also the bigscreen beyond. I’m building a VR sim racing rig. With this 4090 Im feeling pretty good about DCS VR performance for the first time ever. It is a little different From what I have tried. The 4090 is not gonna last any more that a 4080 when it comes to being sufficient. Tried raising the pixel density and resolution settings and it still looks blurry until it becomes blurry and Right now, I have it set at 90hz and max 1. So far 4090 has shown major uplifts in fps. Congrats on your purchase. Still, it'll be interesting to see how amd's new cards perform in vr and whether we get dlss, etc, eventually. 5x res. Sidequest helps. If you uave almost $2,000 to blow on a 4090 the bigscreen beyond blows the quest 3 out of the water on all metrics including the size, fit, weight, and res I'm getting stuttering and frame drops no matter what I play, even steam VR home. I dont use a 4k screen. Buying both cost about same as a 4090 does now and you pay it over longer time span and you get new up to date features too that 4090 doesnt, like dp2 for example. So 3090 delivers average 57% (range 54 to 61 %) of the 4090 in these 5 VR games. Watching movies alone, I wouldn't bother using a headset for, a high end TV is still better. If you're just playing AAA 4k titles either will be fine. At this current moment, I don't think AMD fixed the current VR issues. Thankfully got a card at launch. I have an i7 13700k and an RTX 4090, so it should be great performance. I can't wait to see what sort or flatscreen/VR performance numbers these new GPU's will put out. 920K subscribers in the virtualreality community. Personally I am very happy with my 3080 in VR, and I am not planning to buy. VR doesn't support VRR, and stutter and tearing are unacceptable in this scenario. Yeah a 4090 would run VR games better than a 3080. If you don't have the money the 4080 is a great card. It's one of the first things I try when I upgrade my PC because I would love to enjoy it in VR! Confusingly, lots of people claim it runs fine, but when they post videos of it "running fine" it also runs like trash. So I did more sleuthing, using the search terms "VR Latency Lag RTX 4090" and wouldn't you know it Varjo Aero owners are also experiencing the same problem and Varjo has even come out and acknowledged that there is a problem and that they are working on it. For flat to VR stuff like Resident Evil 7 & 8 I have to go with a mix of high and medium settings. 0 and motion flow, so the crazy thing is there might be another 200% performance available on games that support it. Well, performance per dollar with 4090 is even more expensive so saying it's somehow a better product in terms of what you get for the price is kind of questionable even though it's a common sentiment (that is probably mostly based on the product naming) now. Just to let you know i have a similar setup that is overclocked to its limit and even with my 4090 I get frame drops. I upgraded from a 3090 to a 4090 (if you want to know why, I do this so I can sell my old card while it still has value and recoup some cost). The difference was night and day. I'd say 4090 is the only GPU to safely reach that build goal. lower the custom resolution multiplier on the steam vr video settings, set the graphics settings in game to VR uLtra high and in video mode choose permormance. These are the best setting that I currently use with both my Q3 and QPRo (v59) using Air Link (my preferred wireless option). My question emerged because i read that's kinda of madatory to use HAGS ON with the RTX 4090 due "SER" (Shader Execution Reordering). Jul 14, 2023 · Cyberpunk is still a much better experience. Budget for the headset, controllers and any necessary peripherals (i. None of these games support DLSS3 (I think that goes for No Man's Sky too, or do correct me) - and none of these games support RTX ray tracing (and other advanced non-DLSS RTX features). Alienware M16 with RTX 4090 and 64GB of RAM Oculus Quest 3 connected with USB (Don't waste time trying AirLink) Thanks for the info mate, i believe i'm running basically the same settings except for Post Processing on High and on the OpenXR FFR on Performance/Wide and CAS on 75% sharpness that i saw suggested on racedepartment forum, i really liked the addition of CAS, mostly for the sharpness of far objects, made quite a good improvement for seeing brake marks and such. Thoughts and are you thinking about upgrading, mainly asking VR users I guess. 20 votes, 33 comments. However, I wanted to get a Modlist that would make the game have much Higher Graphics and better gameplay. For example, let's say you buy a 4090 and play Cyberpunk 2077, 4K 144fps would be unattainable without DLSS. 0. I had a 3080 before and switched the gpu first to 4090. edit:re-read your post, looks like you wouldn't need to buy a monitor. After testing Sony VR2, and many other VR headsets I was SHOCKED by the high-quality experience in Half-Life Alyx. Is there a CPU bottleneck at that point? I saw that 5800X3D is bottlenecking some games at ultra settings but nothing on DCS. Its important to adjust your virtual desktop and steam vr settings too! The preset is using amd fidelity but i found out its better to disable amd fidelity in content manager and lower the resolution in steam vr and VD. 5 I hit a stable 90, but of course it brings some visual artifacts My question is - isn't that native VR - Ultra perf in the menu somehow low? I do not perceive it to be blocked by the CPU in this case. Then 4080 16GB comes at $1200, which is too expensive, and a $900 4070 with no real 4070 in sight for 2022? Yeah, that is the aim of these titles. Performance did not change much. The 4090 will get me into 60+ fps in VR in those sims I also do productivity work (programming, rendering, etc). I think 90 fps solid in VR may be unattainable even on a top tier system at this time. I'm not gonna lie, been playing Assetto Corsa Competizione in VR, everyday, all day, since 2020. buy a 4080 Super or 4090 and enjoy the madness (I'd go 4080 Super). DLSS 3 's frame interpolation is not well suited for VR imo, but it needs to be tested anyway. VR Mode 5950x, 128gb RAM, RTX 4090 24gb vram, Reverb G2 90hz, Windows 10, latest nvidia drivers, DCS Open Beta latest || SteamVR, FPSVR monitoring || Motion Reprojection always enabled for constant 45fps || HAGS disabled I just got one. In AMS2 VR settigns I have the super sampling down to 1. The 4090 gets you basicly just 4k-VR with enough fps that you dont have to vomit if you use HIGH/ULTRA settings. Please read the rules before posting. The RTX 4090 delivered 78. So far I have been tinkering around for hours and the one thing I have found is that once i set the resolution up really high I cannot see any of the anti-alising settings within assetto or CSP make any difference what so ever. 0 looks blurry too (at least on the few games I tried). A 4070 will give you a very enjoyable VR experience. I bought 4090 with release. I moved to a 4090 and it completely unlocks VR, IMO it ran well on a 3090 too but the 4090 is just the first card that I really feel allows VR to shine in simulators. My 3x 1400p 32" screen setup PC in the back was the 9900ks/3090 in this older photo. Problem is, I split my time between DCS and MSFS202 and I get horrendous performance in MSFS. This doesn't mean the G2 got worse, it's still a very high end VR headset, but the varjo combined with 4090 is like watching 3 years ahead into the future. Assetto Corsa Competizione is even worse in VR than F1 23, IMO. hold out now and save for the arrival of the 50xx series; 2. The 4090 has the best price:performance ratio of the 4xxx line by a long shot in pretty much every respect. That said, 4090 should be a solid card for several years of new VR devices. BeamNG VR at the moment is a VRAM hog. Graphics: Gamma: 85 (makes Colors richer for me when scaled back a bit) 4090 flexes its muscles especially in PC VR scenarios where more than 16Gb VRAM are often necessary if you optimize IQ ;-) Also the effective resolution is much higher than 4K and in this usecase you can see around 40-50% more performance than 4080. Using it with a 5800x3d as well, for 4k and vr that's definitely a great combo although I wouldn't recommend anything lesser to play even at 4k with the 4090 to avoid noticeable 4090 is more needed if you’re going way up in res/fps like pimax crystal type devices and want to play these games at max settings (usually upping quality settings only offers marginal visual benefits, I say this as the owner of a 4090). 3080 rank gpu is enough. reddit. knimngh snrw xknjp guordtz xkjqgq rgyvvxmfm hhaz ansej wzgie ixdg