Vsan vs nutanix reddit AKA Move the File Shares on Windows, Nutanix, and VSAN to NetApp AFF C400 system. Else, Vsan is a good and robust solution. For immediate help and problem solving, please join us at https://discourse. 0 being unsupported in the loopback for Hyper-V and were proudly pitching it was Nutanix who they think had invented hyper converged thing. . Nutatix Salespeople do promise us similar data replication between two nutanix clusters. They have a Type-1 Hypervisor, AVH, seems to be based off of KVM/QEMU. I would also look into Nutanix Files & FSLogix for a basically all in one VDI environment. VMware and Nutanix both offer very similar things. I manage both vsan and nutanix(on esxi) and management of the cluster on vsan is significantly easier. Nutanix isn't a plain hypervisor like Hyper-V or ESX, its an HCI orchestrator. The customer is a UCS shop (connected to IBM storage) today w about 700 VMs (these are out of scope of this project). I love VMware since I've become experienced with it. Mostly, it was just really expensive for what it is compared to either Nutanix or vSAN ready nodes. If you're thinking about moving from vmware hypervisor, give Nutanix a try. Most of our server infrastructure lives in nutanix and their version of vsan is so much better. Cons - Nutanix is more flexible, interact with others hipervisors (XEN and Hyper-V) Pros - vSAN is compatible with The one advantage of Nutanix is it own hypervisor. 1 (not 6. Storage, compute, networking, and virtualization, together in one platform defined by cloud-scale I’ve been using vsan in a shared network environment and I’ve had more trouble with iSCSI San than vsan. This enables companies to focus on successful business outcomes and new innovations. Nutanix is basically expensive replication software, sitting on top of your hardware choice (we went with Supermicro, from Nutanix). At 20TB vSAN might totally kill you if you weren't planning to replace your hosts. For immediate help Nutanix ADSF delivers a consistent write path regardless of where a VM resides or is moved to within a cluster. Free Hyper-V server is discontinued already and Windows Server 2022 is rumored to be the last one to have Hyper-V role. 0) is new, and is based off of VSAN 6. That being said new company also has Nutanix. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break You might also find real user reviews for VMware vSAN and Nutanix on IT Central Station to be helpful. For our The Nutanix ecosystem blew vSAN out of the water in size, overhead, and general functionality. I would agree about vendor lock. Next, we compared Deduplication & Compression technologies where we learned Nutanix has outright capacity efficiency, flexibility, resiliency and Nutanix went through the same thing, bunch of vmware bickering on their blog about testing methodology etc. I work for a VAR and a client is evaluating Cisco HyperFlex vs Nutanix for a 100-250 seat Citrix VDI implementation. I was looking at VSAN and kept coming across articles published by VMWare saying that their solution is $140k cheaper than Nutanix. They are more flexible and cheaper. ~4000 IOPS @ 0. Nutanix's warranty/Equipment is almost EOL and the VSAN isn't setup right and doesn't do mixed mode or dedicated storage. They've got a VSAN-like setup with their Unified Storage, and you can manage it all via Acropolis. VMware is a reputable and reliable virtualization solution, while Nutanix works In my opinion, the biggest difference between Nutanix and VMware vSAN is flexibility and choice. There’s no storage VM to maintain. Nutanix has some advantages in their products as they developed them more recently. Because you'll need quite a few slots to fit all that Simplicity is the most expensive (50k difference between hypercovered high end and low end, so at the level we are talking no real difference. ". practicalzfs. Been a VMware guy since 3. The primary considerations in the comparison VMware vSAN vs Nutanix are the specifics and requirements of your industry and organization. My starwinds vsan beat out nutanix in speed and price. Keep in mind that for now, this replication is mainly storage-based, so think VXRail is pre-engineered vSAN with better management. Each has a dual 40gb MLOM, which one of the ports is presented to the OS as 4 vNICs (vSAN, vMotion, VM traffic and iSCSI traffic). Also note in the article that vmware has a similar, if not identical eula about needing to approve the testing methods. Nutanix has a number of different products that fit into various different places of a virtualization environment. vSAN rides on top of VMware, where Nutanix is a whole system built from the ground up to Like most of us vmware admins, I am currently evaluating a post VMware Future at my company. Read the rules before posting! A community dedicated to discussion of VMware products and services Thanks for the insight. I'm not sure why you'd want to ditch vSAN for Nutanix at this point. For immediate help and problem solving I have experience with Cisco HX, vSAN ReadyNode on dell hardware, and Nutanix. Also, future licensing concerns with VMWare/Broadcom. I haven’t used them but I suspect their cloud and data protection items are a bit easier to work with. To be honest at the performance levels achieved the constraint is usable capacity not IOPS, so more performance would be somewhat redundant for Exchange. Nutanix ADSFs worst case scenario of two write replicas being sent remotely (during maintenance or CVM failure) Hi, hoping this reddit can help. As an example, this Infrastructure Manager at a financial services firm writes, "We looked briefly at alternatives, but nothing stood out like vSAN. In general, you'll find quite a bit of content with a search on reddit, as there's been quite a few threads about Nutanix. Linus Tech Tips - Reddit vs PC Part Picker vs LTT Forum – Where Should YOU Go for Nutanix feeds vm's on a host with local io, and if its saturated, then it pulls from the network, reducing latency, and network traffic, and it does provide a bit of a performance bump when compared to an identical setup running vsan, however its not night and day. VSAN is very simple to manage when it comes to updates. Also, a robust alternative is the StarWind HCA solution. Nutanix's biggest competiton from a revenue/install base perspective is VSAN actually. I talked to ex-marine guy and young Indian with brackets and horrible accent. We are moving FROM nutanix to vSAN, mostly due to renewal and license costs. This all leaves us with a very real problem - Azure Stack HCI and the whole virtualization Vsan has some advantages for running in the hyper visor instead of running as a storage vm. While VSAN ready nodes are a little more of a build it yourself HCI solution. My experience is that Nutanix is more a buy it approach, turn key ready. If I had my way, and $$$, I would have Nutanix at all sites, setup DR replication (latency permitting) etc. VxRail (VSPEX BLUE 2. Still Nutanix sales had no clue about SMB 3. I saw 3 disks fail on a VXRail that dropped a 4 node cluster and support couldn't do a One of the options was VMware vSAN, which works pretty good from my experience. I currently run several vSAN clusters in production, I would love some feedback regarding We saw approximately 30-40% more usable capacity delivered by Nutanix. Reply reply As an official Fidelity customer care channel, our community is the best way to get help on Reddit with your questions about investing with Fidelity – directly from Fidelity Associates. Nutanix does that for you, and you can add nodes of varying sizes and it orchestrates them all. It's very easy to scale. No question. The officially unofficial VMware community on Reddit. We are mostly using VMware vSAN for our deployments. As mentioned, Nutanix is KVM under the hood, so you can easily migrate to any KVM-based solution. I haven't gone back and revisited it yet. I had a call with VMware to discuss the solution but I was a little concerned about the IOPS I would be able to get out of the solution. but i did a direct comparison of Nutanix vs a regular 1-2-3 infrastrucutre using a leading array vendor a while back. Top tier support from Nutanix too. " Why not throw Dell, HP and EMC EVO:RAIL appliances in the mix? A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. Acropolis is a great tool, and potentially can We had significantly more experience with Nutanix vs vSAN (like years). Nutanix allows you the flexibility Pros - VSAN is integrated in vmkernel, Nutanix ia a VM. I actually built a three node NUC cluster, with the intention of testing out Nutanix, which I called the NucNucNuc (for the stooges) Unfortunately, it didn't go well. S. I posted in a separate section of this thread with some comparisons from my PoV a Nutanix purchase means one number to call for support instead of cross-vendor finger pointing and slowdowns. For the same cost as an HCI solution, you could get a far more resilient and better performing traditional SAN. com with Tackle file services first. Can Hyper-V run on S2D clustered storage? Yes, but you have to create everything manually first. Nutanix nodes can be configured with less storage hardware But I could share one key finding is a difference in write path: vSAN does NOT stripe the data(not by default and if forced to do it - there are some significant limitations). Nutanix was another solution, but surprisingly, it would have cost us more. i came to the personal conclusion that if I was willing to ditch Trying to decide between Nutanix, Hyper-V/S2D and VMware vSphere/vSAN . vSAN requires the VMware Hypervisor. Easy as pie to set up and maintain. Between the two options, I would choose Nutanix. 4. Nutanix is quite expensive licensing wise (so is citrix) but its rock solid. I tried migrating to oVirt and Proxmox. Trusted by companies worldwide, Nutanix powers hybrid multicloud environments efficiently and cost effectively. We are going either with vSAN Ready Nodes or getting server, which are on HCL. ) Nutanix the lack of hardware card accelerator worries me that it relays on software and may not preform as well but a good point earlier about how yo then have a single point of a failure. There's too much going on. I'm not saying VSAN has the features that Nutanix does though. I was scanned and now get tons of their marketing BS. 7K subscribers in the nutanix community. I equate them to Windows vs MacOS or Android vs iOS. If I were building a data center today, I'd build it on Nutanix. Both do pretty much the same thing. There aren't a lot of HCI players right now, so that's maybe another factor. I just think the fancy vSAN/Nutanix style compute/storage model is overkill for file server storage. r/vmware. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes Nutanix offers a single platform to run all your apps and data across multiple clouds while simplifying operations and reducing complexity. Nimble for VDI Project . When considering the effect a single disk failing has on a vSAN cluster vs a Nutanix cluster I would not trust critical workloads on vSAN. It's based on their VSAN technology, utilizes Dell servers, and provides decent support at both hardware and software levels. I cant speak to reliability for nutanix but my star winds vsan has never been down going on 3 years. 134 IOPS a user (assumes 200 messages / day) is almost 30k users per Nutanix node. We're a non-profit SMB with ~250 users spread across 10 sites (3 are ~50 users each) that primarily use Microsoft RDS for connectivity. Most do light office work, some need light audio-visual support (watch YouTube and clipart animations). VMware vs nutanix pricing comments. I did setup Proxmox+Ceph on the NucNucNuc and really enjoyed it. Basically. Nutanix offers a single platform to run all your apps and data across multiple clouds while simplifying operations and reducing complexity. P. The vSAN cluster is Cascade Lake, using Cisco UCS m5s. It's great! It works as advertised, great performance, easy to manage. I’ve seen many performance issues solved (on VSAN and Nutanix) solved by moving from a low cost edge 10G switch to a more data center centric 10G switch. As much as I love VSAN and Nutanix, the reality is that HCI solutions aren't that cost effective for smaller environments due to the license cost. While I know VSAN isn't considered HyperConverged it's the baseline architecture towards that type of deployment. With that experience we had streamlined the configuration, management, maintenance, elasticity, etc of our platform. 2), with a bunch of products stitched together to make it work. Welcome to the IPv6 community We use Citrix & Nutanix. Nutanix isn't just a hypervisor. The latest version of Nutanix doesn't like the gen7 NUCs at all. vSAN was the first solution that came to mind. 5 and certified VCP for 5 and 6. Nutanix vs. We had a great experience with Starwinds Appliances. Can you PoC both options? A vSAN cluster bought for PoC can be easily repurposed and no dollars lost, haven't heard of Nutanix RMAs for "didn't like it. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. Maybe a NetApp/NAS, if that's more your style. ehzkl xnxkyu eqtm gghikp xtwn jyifj thdm kvfqq rqzr ubzeak