Proxmox bare metal vs debian reddit I would love to have a full Linux machine on bare metal which I have never had before. Proxmox excels when you want the containers on a Nice. Run docker in Debian which comes with proxmox Run docker in LXC Seeking Advice: Best Setup for Nextcloud Instance on Proxmox (VM vs LXC, Debian vs Ubuntu, Docker vs No Docker) Hello Nextcloud community! I'm currently in the process of setting up my Nextcloud instance on a Proxmox server and would love I have some old laptops laying around and I wonder would it be better to use a bare metal hypervisor such as VMware EXSi/vSphere, or install a host OS such as debian to host my stuff? What do yall do with your servers that have 10GB or less memory? Proxmox can run both VMs and containers. Currently using a Synology NAS but it’s not a great solution for transcoding video It’s a great solution for audio (plexamp) I have run it in docker, supervised, unsupervised, bare metal in raspberry pi, etc. No DHCP/PXE I switched from proxmox to plain debian with HA and a bunch of other services as docker containers, including mqtt and frigate. proxmox option 2. docker VM with nvidia p400 and HBA passthrough with ZFS on same VM bare metal option. Similarly, restoring those backups onto other Proxmox hosts is super easy if all hosts mount the same NFS storage. For example, I know that with OMV as VM it is best to passthrough entire storage If I understand you correctly, the HA OS image directly on NUC and the HA OS in a VM using Proxmox, is exactly the same instance of Home Assistant (performance, looks, > The installation of a supported Proxmox VE server should be done via bare-metal ISO installer. 1) home assistant core 2) debian with docker for some containers i want to have separated from my main Rocky Linux server. I've not worked with proxmox before and it looked a bit tricky. I'll be having FileBrowser, Samba, What do I need to consider when setting up Proxmox so that the WAN port is not vulnerable via Proxmox? Should I best choose pass-through of the WAN NIC to the Installing Proxmox on a bare metal server is easy when you have direct access. Not ideal for 30, 50, 100 hosts. In some cases it makes sense to install Proxmox VE on top of a running Debian Bullseye 64 I'm debating whether or not it will be better for my server setup to just go bare metal on Linux versus having each service run inside a VM on Proxmox. the experience has been overwhelmingly more controlled than having a bare metal windows box attached to the tv a small desire to try it, just do it). OMV wouldn’t install in a desktop environment so I installed Debian server. It just streamlines so much and avoids the layer of abstraction you will I have a bare metal Rocky Linux server that runs most of my containers and a few bare metal solutions. Had a period of Proxmox in between that and been fiddling with Proxmox on and off for labbing too. Proxmox is fine if you have 2-5 hosts. I would like to know the advantages and disadvantages of all the following methods of running docker containers in Proxmox. Should I stick to Proxmox + TrueNAS or should I just use OMV or Barebone for this backup Proxmox(on Debian), can run many Ubuntu (Computers/OS) with many containers (Docker). . A place to share, discuss, discover, assist with, gain assistance for, and This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. IMO the potential for customization and automation is the main reason I've been using the Debian + Proxmox route. After hours of search over the internet and reading a lot of documentation, I'm more confused than at the beginning. I'm just curious of the nuances of each. I run several dozen hosts on my proxmox cluster without issues. You can run Plex or whatever alongside these on the same bare metal machine and let the scheduler handle the resources, unless it needs dedicated resources for performance reasons, in which case a Linux VM is probably best. I am wondering if there is any big performance difference between running multiple websites with docker and npm comparing to running docker and npm in bare metal. The simple answer: yes, you can install Proxmox on top of Debian. So 3 12TB drives will give you 24 TB of usable storage. I have seen people talk about proxmox and other virtual machines, how complicated is it to get that running? If you are not 100% sure about what your final configuration will be, Proxmox allows for the flexibility of trying different NAS management OS without having to go through a bare metal reinstallation every time. I know either Proxmox or Bare Metal will work. Log In / Sign Up; what are the benefits of running a hypervisor, then stacking VMs + Docker or LXCs on that, vs. Get app Get the Reddit app Log In Log in to Reddit. Super easy migration. Option 2: Run Home Assistant bare-metal on the PC. 20 votes, 14 comments. Proxmox was fine, but it felt like I needed to tinker more with settings in order to make it work how I want it. So far I love my setup now the best. Proxmox on the bare metal; VM for Home Assistant (use the proxmox script to set it up - super simple; easy find using google “proxmox home assistant install script”) Separate VM for ZoneMinder Third VM for all my other docker containers. The difference in performance in bare metal vs virtualization on any moderately modern cpu will be negligible comparing to a fluctuation in your ISP network. Convert existing ESXI server to Proxmox. ubuntu server with docker and ZFS bare metal + KVM I'm currently leaning towards the bare metal option since I have minimal need for VMs. Pass through the HD’s you want to use for Truenas + Apps (like Plex and all of the Arr’s) create zfs pools on pass through drives use 3 drives for each pool. With proxmox you get the same concept as Docker on Ubuntu, but with an extra layer that allows for repeatable, and recoverable operations. Proxmox is a great solution if you want to quickly spin up discreet VMs. Bare metal every time It's only worth doing it in proxmox if you want to try something first and you already have a full proxmox setup up and working. Before I used proxmox i had a Debian kvm /libvirt hypervisor, this was also fine but not as comfortable as proxmox from an hypervisor view. The cpu overhead is <3% with kvm (assuming you didn’t get your cpu from an antique shop). I'm wondering if there would be any performance impact when running Docker Containers inside a VM? I'd say install Proxmox, then Ubuntu Server as a VM. I run OMV on Proxmox with physical disks mapped to the omv vm, i can not notice any performance difference to a bare metal installation if this is what you mean with experience. For immediate help and problem solving, Proxmox on bare-metal vs on top of Debian I read some people just use Debian + Cockpit or whatever or CasaOS? I can also use OpenMediaVault, especially since I already have Proxmox installed right now. ) Debian bare metal, and having Docker/LXCs run on/in that? Just curious - I'm happily set up with Proxmox, XCP-ng is kind of middle ground: VMware turnkey-ness (compared to install Debian, then Proxmox and so on), more integrated (less tinkering, everything is going via its API) but also Open Source. Install proxmox on bare server and run HASSOS and pihole container Install Ubuntu + kubernetes and run HASS and pihole containers. What I did was install debian as the OS on the HOST machine, I then installed plasma desktop on top of that, this gave me something similar to kubuntu which is what I normally use, but because I used debian as the I've been running TrueNAS Core (well, FreeNAS) for a couple of years, before that I ran CentOS with a mix of bare metal installs and VMs. It will net the sum of 2 drive with the 3rd used as parity. I also have proxmox installed on a different server. Ok load Proxmox onto bare metal. Running VMs and Dockers on Unraid, running under proxmox is just adding layers and layers of unnecessary complexity to the situation. just Ubuntu Server bare metal? Read below, but just know that you could run both options for like a week or two and decide what you feel is better for you ;) You can assign all available resources to your single Ubuntu VM. Install Proxmox on the PC and run a virtual Home Assistant Instance on it. I run proxmox as my main gaming pc in the lounge. I run Docker for my I can't directly answer your questions or concerns, but AFAIK in principle Proxmox uses a sort of "hybrid" approach, where the OS/packages are Debian & the Kernel is Ubuntu. No, I cannot manage multiple clusters from the proxmox UI at one IP address. You’ll just install Debian and then Proxmox on top of that. This was a tough call between proxmox and a full os, but I'm more comfortable going this route I think. I have tested in LXC containers as well but for less headaches I chose VMs. It's been running great on debian and I can manage it all through portainer / cockpit. g. Expand user menu Open settings menu. Basically I’ll combine 2 small servers into currently have (one runs Proxmox the other Unraid) into a single more capable / modern one. No IPMI/iDRAC access: You don’t have remote tools to manage the server. Update: fwiw I decided to install a linux distro on bare metal (I like certain things about Rocky/RHEL 9) and will go with openZFS and libvirt to manage storage and virtual machines. I've had Plex on an SSD, harddrives with ssd cache drive, right now it's on a couple mirrored 10k drives with a small caching ssd that I was thinking of moving metadata over to, but before I work on any more experiments I'd like to solve the stability issues, which probably means also documenting what Not exactly the same situation, but I have a media center computer hooked to a TV and I ALSO wanted to use the machine for proxmox. More an appliance than a "general" distro if you prefer. 262K subscribers in the selfhosted community. Proxmox is Debian under the hood, so the difference isn’t all that big. There are features I wish proxmox had. The Proxmox ISO makes a number of assumptions about partition layouts, network configuration, and user accounts that differ from the way I set my cluster up. Which of these would be eaiser and more reliable. The corosync configuration is somewhat limited when it comes to a larger number of nodes in a Bare metal Linux with Samba for Windows client access, sshd for remote administration, iptables to firewall access is just fine. I have a PC build with older (i7 6700k) but very capable hardware. My username right now is really just my wife and I, mostly roku and phone. Proxmox is perfectly capable of running anything you want on bare metal and not within a VM. PVE #1 backs up a CT, PVE #2 restores the CT. If you just want a server to run docker containers then I'd recommend a Debian lite server with Cockpit webUI. I’m planing to do the exact same move from running Unraid on bare metal to running it under Proxmox. I’ve gone for option 2; and it has been serving me well for a couple of years now. And i was wondering what would be the best option. I run Debian 12 + Proxmox on my main workstation as I only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent Build a NAS PC with a bare-metal OS and my various drives. TrueNas seems iffy to me, wasn't a fan of the setup and trying to understood the pool thing. My Proxmox box also handles NAS (ZFS) duties on its bare metal, as well as Docker. Why this vs. On the proxmox, I only have 2 running vm's. I’ll occasionally go to a docker or even truenas for secondary Plex servers (guest access, testing, etc) but my primary has typically been bare metal. I've done it for nothing more than wanting to be able to encrypt the entire installation (which the Proxmox ISO does not give you the option for, but Debian does). Hey, I've a Ryzen 7 5700x PC Build + two old i5-5200U laptops that I'd like to use as a homelab Kubernetes Cluster. The amazing UIs of Proxmox and TrueNAS are appreciated, but in the long run, get in my way. docker VM with nvidia p400 passthrough and ZFS on TrueNAS VM (allows CIFS mounts to work) proxmox option 3. I have only used windows before. It’s still running on “bare metal” and ends up being effectively the One issue I am currently struggling with is whether I should remove Proxmox and install Linux directly rather than as a VM. After Proxmox is up and running I put the server version of Debian 10, with no frills, just SSH. Install Proxmox and don't look back . I really enjoy Proxmox and it served me really well in the past 3 years. just running (e. One good option (for me) is keeping NVMe drives under Proxmox and pass through the SATA controller to the NAS OS. I was wondering If I should go bare-metal or make some VMs using Proxmox or any other virtualization tool and install my cluster on top of these VMs. Load Truenas Scale as a VM in Proxmox. Moved to Unriad bare metal and I am enjoying the experience, don't get me wrong spinning up vm's on Proxmox was so much easier and as others have mentioned it's certainly preferred as a dedicated Hypervisor but one thing that Unraid has over Proxmox is the very user friendly app store where you can spin up docker containers and the like with ease, once I got my array I’ve been a Plex pass user on bare metal for over 10 years. While it lacks a web UI for NAS management, it's based on Debian and can be configured for NAS functionalities through the command line. ftwceny rijuh ybzd ocxcjih pjvbowc qabzkjh bdbyr aimp baifxo fecb